Search

Checklist: Offering Diabetes Tech Consistently Across Patients 

A quick, 2-minute check to support consistent, patient-centered prescribing decisions across all populations.

Written by: danatech staff and reviewed by clinical members of the ADCES Diabetes Tech Committee.

Part of danatech from ADCES's commitment to improving equitable access and appropriate use of diabetes tech in clinical practice.

May 05, 2026

Small variations in how diabetes technology is offered can lead to meaningful differences in access and outcomes. This tool is designed to help you pause, reflect and support more consistent and equitable decisions across patients.

 

Final Pause

If any answer gives you hesitation, take a moment to reassess before finalizing your decision.

Confidence check:
How confident am I in this decision?

When to use this check

  • You’re unsure if a patient is a good candidate for diabetes technology
  • Cost or coverage feels like a barrier
  • A patient has struggled with technology before
  • You want to ensure consistent decisions across patients

Why this matters

Variation in how diabetes technology is offered is well documented. Studies have shown that:

  • Some patient groups including those with public insurance and certain racial and ethnic populations are less likely to use technologies such as CGM and insulin pumps.
  • Insulin-requiring individuals with type 2 diabetes are less consistently offered technology compared to those with type 1 diabetes.
  • Older adults may be less likely to be offered technology due to assumptions about usability.

Supporting more consistent decision-making is one step toward improving access, use and outcomes across patient populations.

Alignment with ADA Standards of Care

The ADA Standards of Care emphasize person-centered diabetes care, appropriate use of diabetes technology and addressing barriers that may affect access and outcomes. The Standards also call on health systems to assess gaps in diabetes care and outcomes by factors such as insurance status, race, ethnicity, preferred language, disability, and social determinants of health.

This 2-minute check is intended to help clinicians apply those principles at the point of decision-making, especially before deciding a patient is not a candidate for CGM, insulin pump therapy, or automated insulin delivery.

Sources & References

  • American Diabetes Association. Standards of Care in Diabetes—2025. Diabetes Care. 2025;48(Suppl. 1).
  • American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Technology: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2025. Diabetes Care. 2025;48(Suppl. 1).
  • Walker AF, et al. Racial differences in diabetes technology use and outcomes in type 1 diabetes: A systematic review. Diabetes Care. 2021.
  • T1D Exchange Quality Improvement Collaborative. Variation in CGM and insulin pump use across populations.
  • Agarwal S, et al. Disparities in continuous glucose monitor use among adults with type 1 diabetes in the United States. Diabetes Care. 2021.
  • McCoy RG, et al. Disparities in diabetes technology use by insurance status and socioeconomic factors. Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology.
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Health Equity and Diabetes.
    https://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/health-equity
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK). Diabetes Disparities.
    https://www.niddk.nih.gov/health-information/diabetes/overview/preventing-problems/diabetes-disparities

The Danatech Digest

Join 25,000+ professionals who get our latest diabetes technology updates

DISCLAIMERS:

This site and its services do not constitute the practice of medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Always talk to your diabetes care and education specialist or health care provider for diagnosis and treatment, including your specific medical needs. If you have or suspect that you have a medical problem or condition, please contact a qualified health care professional immediately. To find a diabetes care and education specialist near you, visit the ADCES finder tool.

ADCES and danatech curate product specifics and periodically review them for accuracy and relevance. As a result, the information may or may not be the most recent. We recommend visiting the manufacturer's website for the latest details if you have any questions.


danatech is Made Possible by Grant Funding and Industry Sponsorship